M Hill

The tricky Choices try had a better outline and gave a more inte respireing dead than Initiation into maturity Initiation into Adulthood is a truly basic test and gave the impression that is was written by a less see writer. I felt the paper was boring and did not keep my attention while reading for each one myopic floor. The most noticeable mistake was that the paper did a mend summary for each story and never provided a conclusion or a position in any of the stories. The checklist says to use expose tense verbs and this story used mostly past tense.The Hard Choices essay gives an analytic thinking of each short story and provides direct quotes from the short stories. Initiation into Adulthood did not do a imperative analysis of the short stories. There were no literary terms used in this essay and there were no works cited. The writer did not list the authors names in the essay to give credit for their work. This essay was boring and did not really give the viewer cohes ive account of what the writer was trying to convey. Hard Choices on the other end was a good read It was exciting it kept my attention and make me want to continue to read more. This essay followed most of the literary rules of writing, Although, I found the plot summaries for this essay to be boring as well. I really liked reading the comparative analysis ND the writers position for each of the short stories. The writer gave us their view of why they felt each image do the decisions that were made for each story from their point of view.Unlike Initiation into Adulthood the writer for Hard Choices uses relegate tense verbs when writing about the short stories. The writer used the necessary resources to support their view of the stories which made the writer seem reliable. The conclusion for this essay was dead on and summarizes the short stories completely and was cohesive with the rest of the essay. Am not really into literature and I dont think I am a very good writer. Hopeful ly, that will change after this semester.I think something that would make both essays easier to read would be eliminating the plot summaries. Like novels and in most movies the contributor/viewer does not want to have the plot given to them in the beginning. I think both essays would be a better read if their plots were a buildup and the reader was given the opportunity to read and draw their own conclusion.